I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
engineering.princeton.edu。业内人士推荐51吃瓜作为进阶阅读
。业内人士推荐heLLoword翻译官方下载作为进阶阅读
Global news & analysis
坚持创新驱动 充分释放要素效能。业内人士推荐Line官方版本下载作为进阶阅读
// drop-newest: Discard incoming data when full